‘zza.

ANYWAY…

I feel like an apology is in order, but 1) my lack of updates has not diminished the quality of anyone’s life, 2) it’s not like you’re paying for it, and 3) after the first week, I doubt you even noticed I wasn’t here.

So tonight, I wanted to talk a little bit about pizza. Which you might have guessed. (The title is inspired by a pizza parlor in Oakland called Zza’s that my family went to once or twice when I was very young. I have no recollection of the quality of the food, although I think I remember that they had an electric sign “ZZA’S” sign inside that they would light up for your birthday. Or maybe I’m just making all this up.)

I finally figured out that for all the things that my oven screws up completely, for all the effort that I have to put into not buring every single thing I throw in there, the one thing it can do really well is cook pizza. I’ve been making a lot of pizza recently, because I enjoy making the dough, it’s easy to find good toppings, and it’s really the only from-scratch bread-type object I can pull off. Plus one batch of dough can last two nights, or one round of pizza plus grissini, which I made tonight. Those turned out pretty good too.

So remember how I said how hot my oven gets – 600 or whatever? Yeah, that’s not right. It has to be much hotter than that. I started noticing that when I put pizzas in the oven after I’d turned the oven on and left it to its own devices for twenty minutes, that the pie would be done in about half the time that any recipe I could find would estimate. And the only reason I thought it was at 600 was because that’s as high as my oven thermometer goes.  My new guess is closer to 700, although without a professional thermometer I may never know.  There may not be an upper limit on how hot it gets – it may just get hotter and hotter until it explodes, and you’re left standing there, fully scorched like a cartoon character, a set of blinking eyes in a body of ash.

Mostly that’s fine, because you want your oven as hot as possible for pizza. It actually works out to my advantage. The only problem is that I don’t have a pizza stone, so my poor baking pan gets all bent out of shape over the heat. Literally. Like Carson Wells, it’s just not prepared for the intensity of the task I have asked of it.  I suppose I’ll have to spring for a stone soon, before my pan shatters in the oven. Plus I have to dress the pizza on the preheated pan because I don’t have a serving board to slide a dressed pizza onto the pan with, so that’s a frantic two minutes. But all in all, the current gear makes a good, crispy crust with a nice sizzle.

Pizza is a great do-it-yourself activity if you plan at least a day ahead – I find that a night in the fridge really gives the crust a good tang.  Here’s the recipe I use for the crust if you’re interested. I’d leave more crust-space than F&W does, and be sure to brush the edges with olive oil. But it’s a good, solid recipe to start with if you don’t have one already.

December 1, 2007. Food Talk. 1 comment.

Insert obscene Sopranos quote here.

bechamel

Bechamel.

basil

Basil.

sausage

Sausage. (This is why you do not see pictures of the tomato sauce or ziti. Also, it is why you do not see more pictures in general. I am not very good at food photography.)

ziti

Baked ziti. One of life’s great pleasures, both to make and to consume. There are many components of the baked ziti, which makes a chef a bit of a traffic manager as it comes together. But the end result, if overseen correctly, is almost always worth it. This batch was good, but not my best. I think that the fresh mozzarella I used was not quite up to snuff – I should have made a trip to the Cheese Store of Silverlake. Ditto the sausage. Also, using lactose-free milk instead of whole milk in the bechamel probably had an effect, although I don’t know how much of one. Nonetheless, I was satisfied.

Whenever I make something relatively complicated like ziti, I am compelled to break out something from the wine closet. Since we only had one sangiovese-based wine in there at present, we opened our 2005 Avignonesi Vino Nobile de Montepulciano. Vino Nobile de Montepulciano, by the way, is an oddly named wine, since it doesn’t involve the Montepulciano d’Abruzzo grape at all; instead it’s made from the sangiovese grape in Montepulciano. This, to me, would be like making a wine from syrah grapes in Napa and calling it “Napa Pinot Noir,” but whatever. The wine was very nice – a perfume of raspberries, lavender, and cedar, and a plush mouthfeel with some dark chocolate, a floral component, and the Suckling magnet, crushed berries – but I think I liked the Il Lastro Chianti Rufina from last night’s meal at Briganti a little more. The Il Lastro seemed like a more pure expression of the sangiovese grape, and it had more structure as well. The Avignonesi was cheaper, however, so that’s a factor, too. It’s tough to find good sangiovese wines for less than $20, so this might be a repeat buy if I can find another bottle.

One more quick note before I go – the New York Times has an article up about looking for the perfect Italian red sauce. It’s interesting, and certainly contains echoes of feelings and thoughts I have had about trying to interpret and/or mimic the sauces and dishes I’ve had in the homes of my Italian relatives. That said, I’ve never understood the purpose of putting fully cooked meatballs in a vat of tomato sauce. When you do this, you let that wonderful brown, crispy crust on the meatball – one of the meatball’s most winning characteristics – get all soggy with sauce.

I understand that people want their tomato sauce to have that meaty richness to it – that’s why you warm up the sauce in the same pan that you cooked the meatballs in (after deglazing it). Always throw the meatballs into the pot with the spaghetti and sauce when you’re in the last stage of cooking the pasta, after it’s been drained pre-al dente. That way, the meatballs aren’t completely dry, but they aren’t given the chance to go limp on you, either.

I suppose I shouldn’t quibble. The world’s army of Italian grandmothers could probably fill a thousand cookbooks with what I do wrong in my ziti recipe. And frankly, meatballs never go in the spaghetti in Italy – this is an American tradition.But I’m not really looking to cook like an authentic Italian, because I’m not. Meatballs in the same dish as the spaghetti is fine, as long as they have that crust. The ingredients to make great meatballs can and will vary according to what’s on hand and what’s fresh, but day-old bread or fresh bread crumbs are a must. If you want a great resource on making meatballs, though, I would first consult Marcella Hazan’s Essentials of Italian Cooking. No Giada for me, thanks.

February 22, 2007. Food Talk, Wine Talk. Leave a comment.

Baker’s dos, don’ts, and dozens.

So we’re back from the Bay. Back with a case (plus one) of new wine gifted to us in light of our upcoming nuptials. It was quite a clever theme for a bridal shower – bring a gift, and a bottle of wine. We made out like bandits, and we certainly are lucky to have a generous family (and some generous friends). Thanks, all.

After we got back last night and we’d unpacked every last box and tin, I decided to give the 8×4 bread pan a test drive, so I broke out the lemon poppyseed quick bread mix that I had received along with the pan. And for what seems like the 4,847th time, I screwed it up.

Why? Because of this little fella:

stove

My Westwood oven.

Now, don’t get me wrong – I don’t hate my Westwood. It’s a compact unit, making it a good fit for our tiny apartment. It’s very old – I’m guessing this is a model from the ’50s – so it’s got some retro chic going on. It has a nice range that has been very consistent, and I love working with gas. The stovetop area is fairly small, which makes for some crowding issues when you’ve got more than two pots on the stove.  On the whole, though, the range hasn’t really let me down.

But oh, that oven. First off, it’s the kind you have to light yourself. This means that you turn the oven on beyond the “gas on” notch on the oven dial, you light a match, you put the match in front of the gas port, and the oven lights itself. Except that with our match box, lighting matches has been an increasingly difficult activity as the match box’s strike surface has grown too oxidized to use. So now it takes me 2-3 times longer to light a match, which means that there is more and more gas roaming around the bottom of the oven by the time I get the match to the port. Will I someday blow myself up when I screw up match after match, finally managing to light the 7th one and holding it irritatedly next to the port without thinking about what I’m doing? Quite possibly. Say goodbye to Hollywood.

But that’s not even the real issue. That’s the temperature control of my oven. Let me take you through a typical oven experience in my kitchen before I figured out what was happending. Let’s say I want to roast a chicken. I light the oven without killing myself, I set the temperature to 475 degrees, just like Judy Rodgers says, and I wait.

Ten minutes later: Open the oven and check my thermometer. Only 200 degrees. Close oven door.

Five minutes later: return. 250 degrees. Feels a lot hotter, though. Oy. Go catch up on my Scary Go Round.

Five minutes later: 450 degrees. Whoa, that was fast! Well, let’s throw the chicken in there.

Fifteen minutes later: Boy, that chicken is crackling loud. Check it: 600 degrees?! What the hell?!? Check the dial: 475. Wha hoppen? The chicken is looking a little angry at all this heat. Turn down to 400.

Five minutes later: check the oven. Still 600! Turn it all the way down to 200. The chicken is seriously unhappy – it looks like it’s been cooked by a pastry chef with a blowtorch for the last twenty minutes. Charred, yet raw.

Ten minutes later: Now we’re at 550, according to the thermometer. Hooray. The chicken is black on top. Internal temp: 130. I hate my life.

I don’t know if my oven is in any way representative of what ovens acted like in the Eisenhower Era, but if it is, how the hell did anyone get anything cooked properly? There’s something wrong here. I think the problem is the calibration of how much heat is produced at certain points of the dial. Between “low” and “250″ on my dial is the same temperature range that most people have set to, say, “on” to “550.” Anything above that is basically nuked. Plus the damn thing gives off so much heat, you can’t even touch the dial with your bare hand after half an hour or so. Don’t even think about touching the handle. And if you’re pulling a pan out of the oven, I’m afraid there’s a two potholder minimum. Sorry, no exceptions. Not even for you, missy.

But after many months of trial and error, error, error, I’ve finally figured out a sort-of plan for how to use the oven and not light things on fire. The secret is knowing when to turn the heat down. There’s a moment when the temperature is just about to make its jump to “blast furnace mode” where it is actually in an acceptable range, at which point you can use it if you do one of two things:

1) Wait until the oven is 50 degrees cooler on the thermometer than what you want it to be, then turn the heat down to “gas on” and put your item in. The temperature will still go up, but if you’re careful and you make a smart guess it will only go up a little bit, ensuring the safety of your food and your baking pan. Or:

2) Wait until the temperature is within 25 degrees of what you want, then open the oven door and keep it open for a good 5 minutes to let the hot air out. This stabilizes the temp enough to allow something to be cooked at a proper, even heat level. Basically, method 2 is a little more reliable and involves a little less guesswork, but it can only be done when the temperature of the apartment is sufficiently cool that keeping the oven open while it’s on is not unbearable – ie, November through March. The rest of the time, it’s back to the estimations of method 1.

For the bread I made last night, I used method 2, but I got impatient waiting for the stabilized temperature, closed the door on my bread too early, and went to reorganize the wine closet. Result? A deep dark crust, not quite black but close. The bread was good, maybe a touch on the dry side but not really a problem, but I wish that I had remembered the golden rule of my oven: Never Leave It Alone Even For A Single Second. It will ruin your day if you do. It cannot be trusted, and it will never be fixed. Ultimately this goes to the core of my problem with baking, which is that it is too much of a precise science for me. It is possible to cook with this oven, I’m sure – I just don’t quite have the fine-tuned skills to adapt to it. I always figure out a way to mess something up, and that I hate the “Here goes nothing!” moment of putting something in the oven, knowing that you cannot do a damn thing to save it at that point – only screw it up more. This is mostly my fault, I know. But the Westwood isn’t helping any.

Of course, today is the day I started my sourdough starter. How will the oven destroy this, I wonder? Will it even get the chance?

February 20, 2007. Baking, Food Talk. 1 comment.

The guacamole variations.

Super Bowl’s coming up. I always get a little excited for it – not for the actual event, which hasn’t contained a team I cared about for over a decade, but for the small get-together that accompanies it. It’s always a good chance to try out some fun comfort-food type recipes that I’ve been thinking about for a while. And of course, it’s always a great opportunity to make a huge batch of guacamole. Making guac isn’t something I get to do all that often these days because J isn’t a huge fan of the stuff, and avocados have such a short shelf life (once they reach ripeness, anyways) that if I buy one there’s an even chance it will wither on top of the fridge before I can get to use it. Considering how rare these things are going to be this spring after this year’s devastating crop freeze, I’ll probably cut back even more on my avocado purchases this year. It would be a shame to waste even one. But I’ll definitely be picking up a few today. They’ll be put to good use tomorrow.

In a similar vein of anticipation, the SF Chronicle has published a group of guacamole recipes in their Wednesday food section. It was fun to look at the recipes, some of them coming from restaurants that I’ve had my eye on for a while. Guac is one of those foods that is simple to make, and yet can run in a thousand different directions depending on what the cook decides to include in his or her version. Most of these are variations on a theme – some combination of tomatoes, onion, garlic, chiles, cilantro (occasionally), and salt. There are also the wacky versions that add sour cream or mayonnaise. Blech. Who would do such a thing?! Avocados are already filled with fat, sweet flavor. Why do you need another (inferior) fat to drown it out? Most food history sources I could find point to this being an American adaptation, which doesn’t surprise me. Damn Americans. Always gotta deep-fry the lily.

There is, however, the tricky question of citrus juice. Usually you’ll see lime or lemon juice, although I’ve seen a few versions with other kinds of citrus.  The problem is, I don’t like either one. For me, the acidity of lime or lemon juice is so effective at cutting through the fattiness of the avocado, it takes away the pleasure of the avocado’s flavor. Unless the cook is VERY stingy, citrus can quickly overwhelm almost everything else in the guacamole bowl. So I usually leave it out. The majority of the Chronicle’s assembled guacamole chefs disagreed with me, though: 3 out of the 5 recipes included lime juice. Oh well. They probably know how to control it better than I do. Which is why I’m leaving it out tomorrow.

Pointless prediction: Colts 27, Bears 17

February 3, 2007. Food Talk. 1 comment.

Moving forward with forewords.

The two newest cookbooks in my collection, Sunday Suppers at Lucques by Suzanne Goin and The Cheese Board Collective Works, have something in common besides a shared shelf: a foreword by Alice Waters, the venerable and legendary chef-owner of what is probably my favorite restaurant, Chez Panisse. This wouldn’t mean very much to me if it weren’t for the fact that in the past 2 days, I have seen or heard promotions for two other books featuring forewords by Waters as well. My curiosity piqued, I did a quick Google search, which revealed over 20 books currently available online with an Alice Waters introduction.

Now, considering how long Waters has been sitting at the head of the Bay Area foodie table, this isn’t surprising in itself, although her Google results for forewords run rings around those of Julia Child, Jacques Pepin, or anyone else I could think of. What’s interesting about the Waters phenomenon is how the stamp of approval that she lends with a few words at the beginning of a work can lend such implied authority to its text. When a book has a foreword by Waters, you can bet that the foreword’s going to be featured in any press and it’ll be mentioned up front in any description you can find online. And this is a chef who’s never had her own TV show, who’s appeared on TV very infrequently, and who probably carries one hundredth of the entourage that Bobby Flay does.

Her support seems to suggest that the author of the associated book has passed through a rigorous set of standards for the proper methods to procure, prepare, or enjoy food, and has been allowed to impart their knowledge to the masses by Those Who Matter. Maybe Waters didn’t invent these standards, but she might be their current gatekeeper. Her esteem in the eyes of food mavens comes from a place that very few other chefs have accessed – from an idea of purity and idealism in the way we eat that will probably never be achieved in the real world. Sometimes I wonder if that kind of power comes more out of guilt that we don’t live according to those rules, and that we’ll never live by those rules, but that we like to surround ourselves with the trappings of those rules to fool ourselves and others into thinking that we will one day eat no produce except that found locally, eat no meat but that raised on humane, organic farms, and create healthy, beautiful, and seasonally-appropriate meals for our families. Is it something to strive toward? Sure. But for how many people is this really a viable potential future?

Regardless, one should make no mistake about it: the Waters backing is a serious boon for a select group of food experts in this country. Twenty forewords! That’s a lot.

February 2, 2007. Cookbooks, Food Talk. Leave a comment.

Ghet what you pay for.

I got an email from Ghetto Gourmet a few days ago. It was one of those happy/sad moments. Happy because the night J and I spent with the Ghetto Gourmet folks was a lot of fun and featured some pretty dang good food, and it was fun to remember that night. Sad because unless the Ghet takes a serious turn away from the direction they’ve been heading in, it’s very unlikely we’ll ever get a chance to go to one of their events again.

A little background for the uninitiated: Ghetto Gourmet is a roving, semi-clandestine dining group that puts on small (less than 40 people, usually) dinners in houses, lofts, warehouses, and anywhere else they can find a room or two, an oven, and a range. Most of their meals have taken place in California, but upon checking their website, they seem to be heading off for more dinners across the country. If you want to go to a Ghetto Gourmet event, it’s pretty simple: you pay in advance through their website, they tell you where to go and what time, and you show up (with wine/beer – it’s BYOB), sit down at a long, low table, and chat with your neighbors while 3-5 courses are brought out in succession. Most of the dinners feature some sort of entertainment, like a local band, a performing troupe, or whatever else happens to be hip at that particular instant. The faux-secrecy, the intrigue, and the quality of the presentation make GG a fun and novel attempt to put a little spark and surprise in the California/US dining scene.

The night that J and I went out for a Ghetto Gourmet meal, the dinner was took place at a house in Culver City (it was originally supposed to happen in Silverlake, but apparently had to be relocated due to size issues). J and I aren’t world champion conversationalists, but everyone we met (including Steve Julian!) was very nice, and the dozen or so people we ended up with at the table were a great group of 20-30somethings. For the most part, the food was excellent and interesting: sushi with cured beef and mint as an amuse bouche, for example. A few dishes felt like they could have been just a smidgen better with a slight tweak or to. But that’s splitting hairs; the dinner was well worth the $40 per we shelled out. The acoustic guitar duo that performed during the dinner was even decent, although they alternated complaints that we were either too quiet or too loud during their songs. The Ghetto Gourmet owner also spent a little too long waxing poetic about how terrific the underground dining community was and what an exciting vanguard we were part of. Nonetheless, the Ghet made for a fun meal and good stuff all around.

So why won’t we be heading out to any more GG events? Well, since that night about six months ago, Ghetto Gourmet’s dinners have risen in price from $40 per head to $50-60. Forty bucks for a dinner of that size, with no tax or tip needed, is a solid deal – a similar dinner at any number of upscaley places in LA will set you and your mate back $100 at least. $50 is pushing it a little…but $60? Without alcohol? If you’re talking about paying $120 for dinner w/BYOB, now you’ve got a whole host of popular restaurants that can compete in that price range. Sunday Suppers at Lucques, prix fixe at Opus, the market dinner at Hatfields, even a standard three-course dinner at Range – all these places can match or beat a dinner at that price, depending on what you order. Places with a lot of weight and heft in foodie circles (and, admittedly, mostly places that I haven’t visited yet. Er.). Places that I would bank on having a good meal at before going back to the Ghet. Another possible outcome of this is that the higher the entrance fee is, the less interesting people you are going to see at the dinners, as the spaces are taken by more guests who are looking to take a break from their usual routine of Patina and Spago, shocked that their neighbor would ask them for a taste of their wine. In other words, a very standard LA restaurant crowd.

I dunno…maybe the folks at GG think that their ability to provide a night’s entertainment has evolved to the point that the extra $ is worth it to their customers. Or maybe people are just tired of going to the same places and they need something new and a little exciting, and they’re willing to shell out a little extra for it. I haven’t been to one of the $60 per dinners, so I can’t speak to their value. But to me, it seems like ringing up that kind of a tab goes against what the owner of GG was going on about at our dinner that night – something that cut across the normal dining experience. Kind of a shame.

January 16, 2007. Food Talk. Leave a comment.

This is what it means to say “strip mall in Berkeley.”


Huddled in a corner together on the corner of Cedar and San Pablo:

Acme

Acme Bakery. I still haven’t found a bakery in LA that measures up to Acme bread. No, not even La Brea. Sorry. You should get out more.

Cafe Fanny

Cafe Fanny. Everyone thinks “Alice Waters” when you mention this place, but she’s only a part owner and she never cooks there. But it’s terrific stuff nonetheless. Recommended: cafe au lait, buckwheat crepes with ham and gruyere (quite small, though), and the chocolate chip and lavender cookie. That’s a slice of ricotta coffee cake in the photo. Pretty darn good. In fact, the best thing you can say about the place is that I haven’t found a weak link of a dish yet. Solid stuff from top to bottom.

Kermit Lynch

Kermit Lynch, the Gallic oenophile’s august, idiosyncratic patriarch. This barrel head watches over Fanny’s patio. Odd that Lynch’s most outwardly facing symbol would be so “heavily oaked,” no?

January 15, 2007. Food Talk, Restaurants - Bay Area. Leave a comment.

Bagel rules.

I’m currently working on a very short-term temp assignment (less than three full days) for a company in Glendale. On assignments like these, you really only have time to meet your immediate supervisor and maybe two or three other workers you’ll be interacting with, and that’s it. You stay pretty incognito the whole time you’re there, smiling at people while making no effort to introduce yourself or engage in anything longer than 10 seconds of conversation. As long as you’re fine with being an anonymous pawn, it’s good work.

The tricky part comes when someone in the office brings communal food into the kitchen – bagels and cream cheese, for example. You’re not really an employee…are you allowed to partake? Nobody will call you out for not being allowed to eat if you’re caught, but when I’ve had office food as a short-term temp in the past, it’s always felt a little bit like stealing. The longer that an assignment lasts, though, the rules change. As far as I can tell, here are the ground rules for how long you have to work in an office in order to gain certain food-related privileges:

1-2 days: You can get water from the office cooler during off-peak kitchen hours. Avoid eye contact at all times.

1 week: You can pour the cold dregs remaining in the office’s coffee pot at 11:30 into a mug (that you brought yourself).

1 month: You can use the microwave. If whatever you are warming up explodes, however, leave the building immediately, don’t look back, fly to Tibet and become a monk. Underground. Forever.

3 months: Go ahead, take the last bagel. It’s an unidentifiable flavor (pistachio? guacamole?) and stale anyway. But don’t touch that cream cheese. That is not for you!

6 months: Where’s the secretary? Three-martini lunch? Oh, three-martini coffee break. Well, see that basket of gawdawful hard candies on her desk – the ones that probably taste like milk and kerosene? Help yourself to a handful; nobody else has.

1 year: You can take a third slice of pizza from the box. Just make sure 1-Month Guy watches you do it as he stands there with an empty paper plate. Yes, 1-Month Guy, this is how it is!

2 years: At the company holiday party, you can order a fourth gimlet, while your boss – still stuck on the eighth step in AA – watches. Bottoms up, sir! Nice sweater.

5 years: At last, the double-whammy – you decide that you need to stay late to finish the project that in all truth would have been finished last week were it not for sheer laziness, so you order Chinese food from across the street for delivery and expense it, along with the $20 tip you gave the half-stoned dude who showed up. Hey, you didn’t have anything smaller in your wallet, right?

10 years: You can store half-eaten candy bars in coworkers’ desks, then ask for them back a month later.

15 years: The new CEO walks into his office in the morning to find you sitting behind his desk, without any pants on, eating cubes of butter. You are given a $5000 raise on the condition that next time he catches you doing that, you are at least wearing underwear.

20 years: You catch the new guy on his first day trying to sneak a bagel into his pocket. His disappearance is mentioned once on the evening news a few days later.

January 12, 2007. Food Talk. Leave a comment.

State of the cookbook nation.

I was killing time in Barnes and Noble today, waiting for a group of friends to arrive so we could head over to Azeen’s Afghani Restaurant (verdict: not bad, but a little overpriced), so I decided to check out the cookbook section. I was in one of those browsing moods where you aren’t really inclined to buy anything, but if you see something that you really want, you’ll probably end up getting it. For me, the particular brass ring on this particular day was Cooking by Hand by Paul Bertolli. I’ve read enough raves about this book and its approach to labor-intensive, meticulous cooking that I’m ready to buy it the minute I see it. But tonight…I don’t see it. Which is fine; I wasn’t really expecting to see it here. It’s a little too specialized to be seen at your average B&N.

But I keep browsing…and the funniest thing happens. I can’t find an interesting cookbook in this entire store! Anything by Alice Waters? Nope. Thomas Keller? Nope. Suzanne Goin, Judy Rodgers, Marcella Hazan? Nope, nope, nope. Instead, it’s a armada of Rachael Ray bookbooks – each with an identical photo featuring a maniacally grinning R. Ray – supported by a flotilla of Paula Deen, a battalion of Sandra Lee, and a brigade of Martha Stewart (who actually is not that bad at some things). Okay, so there are some books here that I am interested in. The Cafe Boulud cookbook looks interesting, the Babbo Cookbook is intriguing, and I’d like to get my hands on one of the smattering of Lidia Bastianich books I can find here. But for the most part, it was the Unholy Trinity of Ray, Deen, and Lee, all three of which are currently dominating programming schedule at the Food Network, that ruled the roost.

I spent a little time flipping through some of these cookbooks on the shelves. On first impression, it seems as if the vast majority of these books are designed for those who cook, yet intend to devote as little time as possible to cooking. The underlying perception here seems to be that cooking is something that is as palatable as doing your taxes; its value is gauged by the celerity of its completion. I guess I can’t get mad at anybody for feeling that way. There’s no moral imperative that dictates that people need to learn how to make their own red wine vinegar or Italian sausage. People have busy lives; there aren’t many folks who have the time or inclination to spend 2+ hours in the kitchen each day carefully constructing the base elements of, say, tagliatelle in brodo. On the other hand, cooking isn’t like playing an instrument. While just sounding capable on a violin can take years of practice, a month’s worth of concentrated effort in the kitchen can produce some pretty amazing results. The fundamental tools for many basic items – flour, sugar, salt, produce – are cheap and readily available. Cooking is a great democratic process through which you can either push yourself to make things that you consider beyond your reach, or be pulled by recipes that you enjoy perfecting through your own methods. Personally, I find great joy in carefully constructing a recipe from nothing more than a few staples. Beyond the power of quality control, there is a meditative aspect to it that appeals to me. It’s rewarding to watch something slowly come into existence for no other reason than your own hard work, be it bread, ice cream, or boudin blanc.

Which is why the preponderance of do-it-quick books at B&N makes me a little sad. One of the Sandra Lee cookbooks proclaims, “Nothing made from scratch!” Ouch. But hey, would these really be so popular if they weren’t good? It’s hard to believe that the recipes in these texts produce bad food. In cookbooks that sell their practicality, that would seem to be a lethal shortcoming. And it’s not often that I have the time to make anything even halfway elaborate from my Zuni or Sunday Suppers at Lucques books.

With this in mind, and in order to knock my culinary high horse down a peg or two, I’m going to try to cook at least a couple dinners from the pages of the Ray, Deen, and Lee playbooks over the next month or so. We’ll see how these recpies stack up in time, effort, cost, nutrition, and taste to my usual repertoire, culled from my own cookbook collection and years of internet recipe browsing. Stay tuned.

January 10, 2007. Cookbooks, Food Talk. 2 comments.

Wrapping up 2006.

As we sneak into the back of the “Year-End Food and Wine Blog Posts” class five minutes after the bell rang, 2006 looks like a pretty good year for The Table. For one thing, I started this blog, which has been a long time coming, and I didn’t abandon it after two posts! Hurray for my mediocre work ethic!

Actually, it was a great year. In a rather odd turn of events, the Best Food-Related Thing That Happened to Me in 2006 was the transfer of my former place of business to East Pasadena. Don’t get me wrong, Old Town was great and the home of a lot of interesting restaurants – although many of them are a little overpriced, many are overrated, and many are both. I’m looking at you, Mi Piace! As I soon learned, however, East Pasadena sits on the border of one of the Southland’s real foodie meccas: the Arcadia/Monterey Park/San Gabriel Asian food hub. It’s here that I was introduced to my first dim sum (which I believe was at 888 Seafood – or maybe Empress Pavilion? Damn, I forget), Din Tai Fung and its ethereal pork dumplings, the Chinese sausage at Sinbala, and what just might be the Greatest Thing Ever, the milk tea with boba at Au79 (thanks Steven!). I know it’s a complete cliche to call something liquid crack, but…liquid crack. For reals. The good news is that I’ve only scratched the surface of this area, and I’m sure that the restaurants and food shops that are just as good as Din Tai Fung and Sinbala number in the dozens. Golden Deli and New Concept, for example, are on my short long list of places to try this year. The bad news is that I’m no longer working in East Pasadena, so I have to drive well out of my way to get out there these days. Oy.

A lot happened to my wine world in 2006, making it hard to pick one thing that I crown with bold type here. J and I started a modest little cellar in a storage closet – a place for the mishmash of bottles reserved for special occasions and bottles that will be opened 2-10 years from now. I started reading wine blogs in earnest – Vinography, Purple Liquid, Dr. Vino. I know now what Arneis is – quick plug for the 2005 Valdinera Roero Arneis, it’s a terrific food wine for $13! But probably the most important thing I did for my own wine education, and therefore the Best Wine-Related Thing That Happened to Me in 2006, was that J and I started going to tastings at various wine stores around LA. Just going to a couple tastings per month can make a huge difference in the range of wines that you can recognize and appreciate. Plus, tastings are a great way to sample dozens of wines that are just enough outside our price range that we would never venture to buy a bottle on its own. Tastings like these at Silverlake Wine, Colorado Wine Company, Lou, and other stores and restaurants were my first introduction to Oregon pinot noir, Central Coast syrah, Bordeaux, northern Rhone, and German riesling. And I’ve got a lot of learning left to do, too – which means lots more tastings. I’m looking forward to trying the ones happening at Mission Wines, Wally’s, and – if it ever opens – KL Wine in Hollywood.

Before I leave, a few quick 2006-related lists:

Some great foods I tried in 2006

  1. Aforementioned pork dumplings, Chinese sausage, and boba
  2. Meatballs and spinach gnocchi at Oliveto’s Whole Hog Dinner
  3. Zuni burger
  4. Bacon-wrapped dates at AOC
  5. Carne asada tacos at El Parian

Some great wines I tried in 2006

  1. To Be Revealed
  2. 1997 Allegrini Amarone della Valpolicella
  3. 2002 Silver Oak Cabernet Sauvignon Napa Valley
  4. 1999 Ridge Geyserville
  5. 2004 Vieux Telegraphe Chateauneuf-du-Pape

Some great restaurants of 2006

  1. Range
  2. Oliveto
  3. Boulevard
  4. AOC
  5. Saddle Peak Lodge

Best moment of 2006

Dinner at the Saddle Peak Lodge, sitting at the Ernest Hemingway table in front of the imposing fireplace, just after J and I got engaged. And the 2004 Patz & Hall Pinot Noir Hyde Vineyard was pretty freaking good too. All in all, a magic moment.

January 7, 2007. Food Talk, Wine Talk. 2 comments.

Next Page »